Successful students often do the followings while studying. First they have an overview before reading. Next, they look for important information and pay greater attention to it (which often needs jumping forward or backward to process information). They also relate important points to one another. Also, they activate and use their prior knowledge. When they realize that their understanding is not good, they do not wait to change strategies. Last, they can monitor understanding and take action to correct or “ fix-up” mistakes in comprehension.
Conversely, students with low academic achievement often demonstrate ineffective study skills. They tend to assume a passive role in learning and rely on others(e.g, teachers, parents) to monitor their studying. For example, low-achieving students often do not monitor their understanding of content, they may not be aware of the purpose of studying, and their show little evidence of looking back, or employing “fix-up” strategies to fix understanding problems. Students who struggle with learning new information seem to be unaware that they must extent beyond simply reading the content to understand and remember it. Children with learning disabilities do not plan and judge the quality off their studying. Their studying may be disorganized. Students with learning problems face challenges with personal organization as well. They often have difficulty keeping track of materials and assignments, following directions, and completing work on time. Unlike good student who employ a variety of study skills in a flexible yet purposeful manner, low-achieving students use a restricted range of skills. They can not explain why good study strategies are important for learning, and they tend to use the same, often ineffective, study approach for all learning tasks, ignoring task content, structure of difficulty.
Which of the followings is NOT an evidence of monitoring studying?
Hãy suy nghĩ và trả lời câu hỏi trước khi xem đáp án
Lời giải:
Báo saiĐáp án A
Điều nào sau đây là KHÔNG PHẢI là dấu hiệu của việc theo sát chuyện học hành?
A. Nhìn ra sau lưng.
B. Theo sát sự nhận biết nội dung.
C. Nhận thức được mục đích của việc học.
D. Khắc phục sai lầm trong hiểu biết.
Dẫn chứng ở câu thứ 3- đoạn 2: “For example, low-achieving students often do not monitor their understanding of content (B), they may not be aware of the purpose of studying (C), and their show little evidence of looking back, or employing “fix-up” strategies to fix understanding problems (D)” – (Ví dụ, những học sinh kém thường không theo sát sự nhận biết của mình trong nội dung, họ có lẽ không nhận thức được mục đích của việc học, và họ không thể hiện dấu hiệu của việc nhìn lại, hoặc dùng chiến lược “sửa chữa” để khắc phục các vấn đề về mặt hiểu biết).